Here’s a very cogent analysis on why Kodak died while Fuji survived. The author’s conclusion:
Surprisingly, Kodak acted like a stereotypical change-resistant Japanese firm, while Fujifilm acted like a flexible American one.
__________________________________________________________________
Please keep these blog posts coming! All you have to do is shop by clicking on the advertisements below. It won’t cost you a penny more to shop that way, but it will provide me with a small commission that enables me to spend time working on new blog posts. Thanks!
Thanks for the link Laurence. Am very grateful for your site and always tune in for the latest blog posts. Just thought I'd mentioned that there seems to be a problem with images missing from various pages, such as http://laurencekim.com/2008/05/27/heather/ and http://laurencekim.com/2008/04/21/jennie/ and http://laurencekim.com/2008/03/20/maurice-the-fish/ Would love to be able to check these out again! (January 15, 2012 | 02:52pm)
Its interesting because I used to work for Circuit City (when they existed). I worked in the camera dept. I hated selling the Kodak cameras because I felt that they had some of the worst image quality out of the bunch. Their stuff although very user friendly, seemed very "cheap" to me. But i was always told to push the Kodaks over the Sony's and Canon's because there was a bigger profit margin with the Kodaks. I love them for what they did to try and help revive the dieing film format. But they could've made better choices revolving around digital and the consumer line.Good read. (January 16, 2012 | 03:22pm)